*****CMKX - CMKM Diamonds Inc***** Keeps On Ticking...

__ * $7 Secrets *__

Monday, June 29, 2009

SEC INFORMATION FOR CMKM DIAMONDS INVESTORS

SEC Obtains Summary Judgment Against Four Defendants in CMKM Diamonds Case

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/claims/cmkmopinion062309.htm

INFORMATION FOR CMKM DIAMONDS INVESTORS
CIVIL ACTION AGAINST CMKM DIAMONDS, INC.

URBAN CASAVANT, et al.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On June 23, 2009, the federal district court in the District of Nevada granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against defendants John Edwards, Daryl Anderson, and Kathleen and Anthony Tomasso.

The court ordered:

Edwards to pay $28,583,288.98 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and a civil penalty of $26,400,000;
Anderson to pay $2,490,211.04 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and a civil penalty of $2,300,000; and
The Tomassos to pay $702,131.22 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and a civil penalty of $648,500.
The court ordered the defendants to pay these amounts to the Clerk of the Court for the District of Nevada within ten business days. Any amounts paid to the Clerk will be deposited into an interest-bearing account with the Court Registry Investment System.

In cases where the SEC obtains a judgment to recover money from the defendants, and the defendants do not comply with the judgment by paying the money, the SEC will seek to enforce the judgment.

It is not yet known how much money, if any, will be recovered in this case. If the assets ultimately collected are sufficient for a practical and economically feasible distribution of funds to investors, the SEC may by motion to the court propose a plan to distribute the funds. No funds can be distributed to investors unless and until the court approves a distribution plan.

Order Granting SEC’s Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants John Edwards, Daryl Anderson, and Kathleen and Anthony Tomasso (June 23, 2009)
http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/claims/cmkmopinion062409.pdf

BACKGROUND
On April 7, 2008, the SEC filed a civil injunctive action against CMKM Diamonds, Inc., its former Chairman and CEO, Urban Casavant, and 12 other defendants involved in the alleged illegal issuance and sale of unregistered stock of CMKM Diamonds, Inc., purportedly a diamond and gold mining company located in Las Vegas, Nevada. The SEC charged all of the defendants with violating the registration provisions of the federal securities laws. In addition, the Commission charged CMKM and Casavant with violating the antifraud and various reporting, record keeping, and internal controls provisions.

Litigation Release No. 20519: Securities and Exchange Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc., et. al, United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Civil Action No. 08- CV 0437 (April 7, 2008)
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2008/lr20519.htm

Complaint
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2008/comp20519.pdf

SELECTED COURT ORDERS

Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction Against Defendant CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (April 21, 2008)
http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/claims/cmkmfinaljudgment.pdf

On April 21, 2008, the court entered a final judgment against CMKM Diamonds, Inc. enjoining it from future violations of the federal securities laws.

Order Granting SEC’s Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants John Edwards, Daryl Anderson, and Kathleen and Anthony Tomasso (June 23, 2009)
http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/claims/cmkmopinion062409.pdf

OTHER SEC ACTIONS CONCERNING CMKM DIAMONDS

Litigation Release No. 20855: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marco Glisson, Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-00104 (D. Nevada) (January 15, 2009)
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2009/lr20855.htm

Complaint
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/comp20855.pdf

In the Matter of Daryl Anderson, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-13156 (September 2, 2008) (Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Notice of Hearing)
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2008/34-58449-o.pdf

Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58958 (November 14, 2008) (Order Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2008/34-58958.pdf

In the Matter of CMKM Diamonds, Inc, Initial Decision Release No. 291, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-11858 (July 12, 2005)
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/id291bpm.htm

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 52694 (October 28, 2005) (Order Dismissing Review Proceedings and Notice of Finality)
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/34-52694.pdf

Release No. 34-51305 (March 3, 2005) (Trading Suspension: CMKM Diamonds, Inc., aka Casavant Mining Kimberlite International, Inc.)
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/34-51305.htm


http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/claims/cmkmopinion062309.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home Previous Page Modified: 06/26/2009

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Message For SEC...

I would like to congratulate the SEC on the recent update that was published regarding CMKM Diamonds.

However, CMKX traded for less than 3 years from late 2002 to 2005, and now it has been revoked for almost 4 years…
And shareholders still have nothing.

As a damaged, defrauded shareholder, I would like to know if there is any realistic chance that CMKX shareholders will ever receive any compensation for their investment.

Why haven’t any criminal charges been filed against the officers & insiders who apparently masterminded the theft of millions of dollars from thousands of shareholders?

Meanwhile, payments for Madoff investors are already being approved only months after the scam was exposed.

Where are the headlines and perp walks for CMKX?

ThankYa...ThankYaVeryMuch.

Anonymous said...

Note - This is the response I received today, 7/10/2009.
------------------------------

Thank you for your additional communication.

Please note that the only new information we have available to the public is the information you have found on our website. Also, please note that the SEC does not have criminal prosecution authority although we refer certain cases to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution.

I hope this information is helpful.

Sincerely,


Steven G. Johnston
Special Counsel
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Sonal Jain said...

MMTC aims to complete stake sale in Indian Commodity Exchange by 2017-end
Share Market Company